Austria-based technology company moves to larger office and support facility in the Atlanta area.
Austria-based Next Generation Recycling Maschinen GmbH (NGR) says it has relocated its Next Generation Recycling Machines Inc. business unit from its previous spot north of Atlanta to a larger space in south Atlanta close to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport.
“From our new location we are offering a vastly improved portfolio,” says Peter Schneider, president of NGR Inc. “Strategically positioned very close to the international terminal of the well-known Atlanta airport, from here we can showcase our increased service offering, our competence and the largely increased technical center in a very improved fashion.”
NGR, an equipment and technology provider for the plastics recycling industry, says it has some 140 employees in Austria and at three sales and service facilities located in the United States, China and Malaysia. The company generates about 50 million euros ($59 million) in sales annually.
“We are operating recycling machines on production scale for post-industrial and postconsumer applications and markets,” says Schneider of the new Atlanta facility. “Customers can recycle their materials in scheduled test runs on various extruder, filtration and pelletizer configurations. From there they can reintroduce the recycled pellets into their production processes and evaluate the success. We pick up our customers at the airport and minutes later they can see their materials running on our machines. It does not get any easier than this.”
The new customer center also supports current and future customers via the availability of spare parts onsite and via a service team with increased capacity and capabilities, says NGR. Comments Schneider, “Competition for talent made it—specifically during COVID-19—necessary to offer an attractive work environment. With the new location, we tripled our footprint for offices and our technical center, and we are offering flexible work arrangements.”
As a further expansion of capabilities, an additional cutter-compactor-combination recycling line (C:GRAN) will be added to the test center next May, “specifically targeting typical post-consumer applications, which specifically in the U.S. market became more important recently,” says the company.
Customers will be able to process and test their postconsumer materials on the additional lab machine by next June, according to NGR.
Equipment supplier says domestic rare earth infrastructure critical for magnet producers.
Newton, Kansas-based Bunting has voiced its support for the Rare Earth Magnet Manufacturing Production Tax Credit Act (H.R. 5033), which it says can help provide U.S. suppliers with tax incentives for domestically producing rare earth magnets.
Bunting says the act was introduced in the House of Representatives Aug. 10 by Reps. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA).
A letter to four congressional leaders from a coalition of companies (including Bunting) and trade associations states in part, “This legislation would address market imbalances and help prevent non-market action from disrupting a resurgent rare earth industry in America. Moreover, this legislation would empower our industry to obtain necessary investments from the private sector and accelerate production.”
Bunting adds, “Currently, China supplies 90 percent of the world’s rare earth magnet needs, and it is essential to support domestic rare earth infrastructure so that the U.S. does not remain subject to the actions of foreign governments”
Bunting says it “is proud to be part of the coalition urging Congress to include the production tax credit for rare earth magnets proposed in H.R. 5033. As a leader in the design and manufacture of magnetic equipment, custom magnets and magnetic assemblies, we support H.R. 5033’s efforts to support domestic manufacturing of rare earth magnets using domestic materials.”
The company says a domestic rare earth magnet supply chain will better enable it to provide magnet components used in several applications. In the recycling sector, Bunting supplies equipment to the scrap metal, material recovery facility and concrete crushing sectors, among others.
“This legislation would empower Bunting and our industry peers to build a domestic rare earth magnet supply chain that is free of foreign reliance and supports the growth and innovation of the American economy,” states the company.
As Southside Recycling waits to start up its new state-of-the-art shredding facility in Chicago, the company is navigating permitting issues related to environmental justice concerns.
When Stow, Ohio-based Reserve Management Group (RMG) began constructing Southside Recycling a few years ago in Chicago, the company intended to build the most advanced automobile shredding facility in the country. To date, the company has invested $80 million to build the shredding facility on a 175-acre property that it owns along the east side of the Calumet River. RMG also operates other long-running recycling businesses—including Reserve Marine Terminals, Napuck Salvage of Waupaca, South Shore Recycling and Regency Technologies—at the site, parts of which it has owned for nearly 25 years.
“We wanted to build the best shredding facility imaginable,” says Hal Tolin, RMG’s chief operating officer. “We’re very confident we’ve done that.”
RMG says it designed Southside Recycling with environmental protections and the community in mind. The facility features a European-style shredder enclosure to better contain noise and emissions. It incorporates a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) and wet scrubber to address the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The shredder also features a suction hood and high-efficiency filters to capture metals and particulate matter. The Southside Recycling operation even features an on-site wastewater treatment plant and air monitors that will measure emissions 24/7 once the business is running.
RMG has performed various landscaping improvements, including planting and maintaining about 200 native trees, on the 5-acre strip that separates the facility from the neighboring community. Over the many years RMG has operated in this part of the city, the company has engaged with the community by backing youth sports leagues, supporting the local police department and providing material and financial assistance to the Southeast Side of Chicago Food Pantry, which distributes meals to more than 1,200 people each week out of a building on RMG’s property that the company provides to the pantry rent-free.
By early 2021, all equipment had been installed and employees were ready for business to ramp up at Southside Recycling. The company was just waiting on a large recycling facility (LRF) permit from the city of Chicago to begin operations. According to RMG, this new permit applies to just a few businesses that meet certain thresholds for volumes of material handled, and the rules governing it were released in June of 2020. Southside Recycling was the first company to apply for an LRF permit under these new rules.
Southside Recycling submitted its permit application in November 2020. Shortly before this submission, the company says, it had received promises from city officials that its permit would be issued by year-end. Following a public hearing on the application and a request for additional information from the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH), the company submitted a revised application in mid-January 2021. Tolin says that, following the submission of the revised application, the city assured the company that its application was complete and sufficient.
But, as winter turned to spring, Southside Recycling had still not received the anticipated permit it needed to begin operations. Tolin says the city sent another request for additional information about the facility and the other RMG businesses operating on its property—details that he says were not mentioned in the permit application requirements or any other part of the permitting process to that point.
Environmental justice (EJ) activists also protested the Southside Recycling facility, expressing concerns about the facility’s proximity to schools and residential neighborhoods on Chicago’s southeast side. According to the company, these concerns were heeded by CDPH in spite of its own LRF rules’ definition of “sensitive areas” as those within 660 feet of a school. The company says its shredder is more than 2,500 feet away from the nearest school.
The city ultimately shut down its permit review process for the Southside Recycling facility in the first week of May after U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Michael Regan wrote a letter to Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot. This letter, which referenced previous conversations between Lightfoot’s administration and the EPA, suggested that the city halt the permit review process to perform an EJ analysis and health impact assessment on the facility. Regan’s letter did not include details of the suggested analysis to be performed or cite any relevant EPA authority over the city’s permitting process.
Steve Joseph, CEO of RMG, says that as of early September the company had yet to receive any information on this analysis.
“Nobody has defined what [the assessment] is, what they’re doing and when they’re doing it,” he says. “Commissioner Regan’s letter came out on May 7 and then [CDPH Commissioner] Dr. [Allison] Arwady sent me a letter on the 10th that said something to the effect of ‘in the coming weeks, we’ll be letting you know what we’re doing.’ We’ve reached out many, many times, to ask, ‘What can we do to help? What are you doing? When are you doing it?’ I think it has been 17 or 18 weeks since the Regan letter. I don’t want to count again. We’ve gotten nothing,” he said of the situation in early September.
As of press time, things had not changed for the company. Southside Recycling is stuck in limbo, waiting for both details of the additional assessment and the issuance of the LRF permit.
The story of Southside Recycling traces back to an agreement that RMG negotiated with Chicago-based General Iron several years ago.
General Iron, which was owned by the Labkon family, had operated an automobile shredder in the Lincoln Park neighborhood on the north side of Chicago since the 1970s. While the Lincoln Park neighborhood was originally zoned as a planned manufacturing district (PMD), the neighborhood gentrified over the years and manufacturing businesses began leaving the area.
A few years ago, the city removed the PMD designation from the Lincoln Park site. General Iron remained one of the only manufacturing businesses left, and the scrap recycler faced scrutiny from neighbors and the city to relocate or cease operations.
RMG had been operating recycling businesses on its southeast side property since the 1990s, and Joseph says he had been paying attention to General Iron’s situation for some time. Although RMG had stayed out of the shredding business, he says the company saw an opportunity to build a new business as General Iron continued to face pressure to shut down its longtime operation in Lincoln Park.
“We had a relationship with the Labkons. We did a little bit of business with them and knew them,” Joseph says. “We picked up the phone one day and said, ‘We know you’ve put this business on the market, and we know that you’ve been looking around for property.’”
In 2018, RMG struck a preliminary deal with the Labkon family to buy General Iron’s assets and build a new facility on RMG’s existing property. The companies envisioned the arrangement would lead to “a new, modern metal recycling facility.”
Around that same time, RMG and General Iron met with community stakeholders and environmental groups on the southeast side, including the Southeast Environmental Task Force (SETF), the Southeast Side Coalition to Ban Petcoke and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), to answer questions about the proposed recycling facility and explain how the design of the new business would ensure protection of the community and environment.
However, when the companies attempted to continue dialogue with the environmental groups, they were firmly turned down. “SETF and the local, regional and national organizations aligned with SETF uniformly and unconditionally oppose the proposal for General Iron to operate on Chicago’s southeast side [sic],” Keith Harley, an attorney for SETF, wrote via email that RMG shared with Recycling Today. RMG says Harley incorrectly identified its business as General Iron in the correspondence. “These organizations are determined to oppose General Iron at every point in the approval process and, if necessary, every day thereafter.”
During this period, the companies were also engaged in discussions about the project with the city of Chicago. “Before we closed the deal, we knew the city would be a key piece of this,” Joseph says. “We needed to know that we could continue to run operations on the north side [in Lincoln Park] while we constructed a facility and got the permits to do this.”
In 2019, Chicago elected Lori Lightfoot to take over as mayor. Discussions between the city and the companies paused for several months as the new mayoral administration took office. Talks eventually restarted, and, after numerous meetings, an agreement between RMG, General Iron and the city of Chicago was signed in September 2019. This contract enabled the continued operation of the Lincoln Park operation until the end of 2020 and outlines how the city would “reasonably cooperate with RMG in achieving the efficient, expeditious transition of the business to the Southside Properties, including reasonable assistance with processing and review of license and permit applications.” The agreement also includes clauses providing for meetings at the request of any party no less than once every 60 days, as well as a promise from the city to apply enforcement of its ordinances, rules and regulations “neutrally and consistently to General Iron, RMG and other metal recycling facilities in the city.”
“We closed the transaction with the Labkons a week or two after signing the agreement with the city,” Joseph says. “[The acquisition] was ready for approximately 10 months, but we were not closing the deal before having that signed agreement with the city. We knew what we were going to spend [on the new facility], and we knew we needed cash flow from existing operations to be able to get us through the gap.”
Also in September 2019, RMG applied to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) for a construction permit to build and operate the shredder, a process that would normally include a 90-day public comment period. Given the EJ concerns that had long affected the southeast side of Chicago, IEPA took additional steps to allow for public review of and comment on the permit application. In June 2020, after a 270-day public comment period that included multiple public hearings, the IEPA issued the construction permit and related conditions by which Southside Recycling would be required to abide. Those conditions were shaped by both the concerns voiced by members of the public as well as IEPA’s consultation with scientists from Region 5 of the U.S. EPA, who commended the state agency on its thorough public engagement and EJ process.
In the same month that the IEPA permit was issued, the city announced its new rules governing permits for large recycling facilities. The company reports that RMG and General Iron had been aware that these rules—primarily aimed at shredding operations like Southside Recycling—were in the works but figuring out how to design and build a facility that abided by the new regulations presented another obstacle to navigate. These rules include standards for monitoring pollution, noise and traffic, among other things.
“They created the new large recycling facility permit, which we knew was going to happen before we started construction,” Joseph adds. “We and others, including the environmental groups, provided input and worked with the city to develop those rules. They had public meetings talking about what that LRF permit was going to look like. It’s probably the most stringent recycling facility permit that exists anywhere in the United States, especially given the requirement for 24/7 air monitoring.”
In response to the LRF rules, RMG ensured that Southside Recycling included air monitors at the perimeter of the property, which Joseph says are operational today. When the business is running, emissions data will be available to both the city and community stakeholders.
To date, Joseph says he has only seen one other automobile shredder in his 30-plus-year career that comes close to the level of environmental management that Southside Recycling has installed to comply with the LRF rules.
Southside Recycling submitted its initial application for the LRF permit in November 2020. After filing an amended application in response to Chicago’s request for additional details and clarifications, Joseph says the company began receiving assurances from the city in January of this year that the revised application satisfied all LRF permit requirements.
General Iron was set to close operations in Lincoln Park at the end of 2020 per the agreement with the city. Joseph says RMG spoke with city officials numerous times in the last few months of that year to discuss timing of General Iron’s shutdown and receipt of Southside Recycling’s permit.
“We pointed out to the city that we had been promised our permit by the end of 2020,” Joseph says. “Since we hadn’t received it, we also told them that we were considering the option of remaining operational on the north side.
He continues, “We were told in no uncertain terms [on Dec. 31, 2020], ‘If you don’t shut down tomorrow, forget about doing anything on the south side. But don’t worry, you’ll get your permit.’”
At that point, Joseph says, RMG saw few alternatives. “We said, ‘OK. We’re going to comply with the agreement, and they’re going to do what they said they’re going to do. We have to shut down, so we’ll shut it down.’ At the end of the day on the 31st, we finished working and subsequently started dismantling.”
But months passed after General Iron closed, and Southside Recycling was left waiting on the LRF permit. Tolin says the company was in regular communication with CDPH that eventually culminated in an April 26 letter to Commissioner Arwady outlining everything that had happened to that point and requesting a meeting with her per a condition in the companies’ signed agreement with the city.
The company never got that meeting with Arwady, and, in May, the city announced an indefinite halt to its review of Southside Recycling’s permit application in response to Regan’s letter.
Joseph says, “The mayor shut this down due to pressure and to score political points—she clearly has that with the people that are screaming about this. And we’re caught in the crosshairs.”
Given the lack of a permit in spite of the city’s signed contract promising fair and timely review, the closure of General Iron’s north side operation as outlined in that same contract and the assurances from Chicago officials that Southside Recycling’s LRF permit application was complete and sufficient, RMG decided to take legal action. In mid-May, Southside Recycling and RMG filed a federal lawsuit seeking a court order that would direct Chicago to issue the final permit to the company. The lawsuit alleged that the city had wrongfully failed to issue the last permit needed for Southside Recycling to begin operations, despite acknowledging for months that the company had satisfied all the requirements.
However, U.S. District Judge Robert M. Dow rejected Southside Recycling’s claim that its constitutional rights were violated since the city had not yet denied the permit application, rendering the company’s claims not ready for adjudication in federal court. Dow dismissed the lawsuit June 30, noting that Southside Recycling’s claims were better suited for state court at that time.
In response, RMG and Southside Recycling filed a lawsuit in the Illinois Circuit Court of Cook County in early July. As in the federal lawsuit, the lawsuit alleges that the city had wrongfully failed to issue the last permit needed for the company to begin operations in spite of its acknowledgements that the company had satisfied all requirements.
In the second week of September, Circuit Judge Michael Mullen scheduled a preliminary trial for Oct. 20 at which Southside Recycling will have an opportunity to prove its claims in court.
Recycling Today reached out to Mayor Lightfoot’s office to learn the city’s perspective on the recycler’s permitting process and operations, but the city declined to be interviewed and instead provided a statement via email from the CDPH.
“We appreciate Recycling Today’s desire to present a fair and balanced report related to the issues involved with permitting for Southside Recycling/RMG’s recycling operation on Chicago’s southeast side, but at this time we are not able to discuss this matter, as it is once again being litigated,” the Aug. 3 statement from the CDPH to Recycling Today reads. “The Chicago Department of Public Health has engaged in a thoughtful, data-driven and robust process that took into consideration the application, supplemental materials, expert reports and studies, as well as input from residents who will be most directly impacted by RMG’s proposed new use. Given the recent directive from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, we must work with them to conduct a further analysis of potential adverse environmental impacts.”
Although Southside Recycling installed what it reports to be the latest technologies available to reduce emissions and control pollution, including the RTO and wet scrubber to address VOC emissions from the shredder, EJ activists expressed concerns about the facility throughout the permitting process. A few activists also participated in a hunger strike for weeks earlier this year to gain the attention of Chicago officials.
One of the main concerns activists have expressed is that the facility is too close to schools and residential neighborhoods to safely operate.
“Despite RMG’s repeated assertions that its operations are safe, the company’s actions undermine any credibility it might have on safety,” says Gina Ramirez, Midwest outreach manager for the NRDC, who opposes the facility’s startup. “General Iron was pushed out of the north side because the community had very real concerns over fires, explosions and emissions at the facility. Southeast side residents have consistently raised concerns about General Iron moving a massive metal shredding operation next to our schools, homes and parks.”
She adds that she also is concerned about an abandoned building that collapsed on RMG’s 175-acre campus earlier this spring, which the company confirmed this summer. “RMG’s latest safety lapse and failure to abide by city regulations brings home why another dangerous facility does not belong at the RMG site and why southeast side residents cannot trust RMG’s hollow promises to be a good neighbor.” The company pointed out that the collapsed building, which is located at the other end of the RMG property more than a quarter mile from the new shredder, had been unused and unoccupied for over 30 years.
Activists also cite that the shredding facility moved from a wealthier, majority white neighborhood on the north side of Chicago to a majority Black and Latino neighborhood on the southeast side of Chicago, which they say is an EJ violation. In an online press conference Aug. 4 hosted by SETF, Lauren Bianchi, a teacher at George Washington High School in Chicago, called the move “an act of environmental racism.”
She said, “We should be working to clean up the existing toxic area, such as the building that collapsed in April, not adding to them with more air pollution.”
Stow, Ohio-based Reserve Management Group (RMG) intended for Southside Recycling, its new automobile shredding site on Chicago’s southeast side, to be a modern metal recycling facility that incorporates the latest in environmental protection technology. The company has invested nearly $80 million to build the facility on 23 acres in the middle of a 175-acre parcel that it already owns along the east side of the Calumet River and where it operates other recycling businesses.
While RMG relocated the regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) that had been operating at the now-closed General Iron site on the north side of Chicago, everything else at the facility is new. General Iron was among the first auto shredder operators in the country to employ an RTO, which is designed to destroy volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, emissions from its auto shredder.
To reduce the possibility of explosions in the shredder and RTO, Southside is using a lower explosive limit, or LEL, monitor that is designed to automatically divert airstreams with higher levels of combustible gases away from areas where combustion can occur. The LEL monitor will continuously measure and electronically record the concentration of flammable vapor between the shredder and RTO, according to the company.
Realizing the company’s vision for the site involved enclosing the shredder, in part, but this also was a requirement of the new Large Recycling Facility (LRF) permit that became effective in Chicago June 5, 2020, says Jim Kallas of Southside Recycling. Kallas is the company’s environmental manager.
“However, we would have enclosed the shredder anyway as we did at General Iron since it effectively mitigates noise and dust and it also adds a level of safety in the event that material is ejected from the shredder,” he says.
General Iron’s shredder enclosure consisted of overlapping layers of rubber belting, while the Southside enclosure, supplied by German company ILG, is more robust, Kallas says. “We don’t believe the panels are used anywhere else in the country.”
ILG’s enclosures are made from conventional steel structures and soundproofing elements that are installed in vertical and horizontal modules in the steel beam construction.
ILG’s Rolf Schaffrath has told Recycling Today that the company does not take a “one size fits all” approach when supplying shredder noise abatement products. “Noise-reduction measures always depend on specific conditions affecting sound at the shredder site, including [sound wave] reflection from existing buildings and their arrangement relative to the shredder and differences in height between the sound source and emission point,” he said.
The company’s website states, “In planning and implementing our projects, we always strive to fulfill both regulatory standards as well as the location-relation issues and ideas of the operator.”
To further reduce noise, Southside positioned the shredder 2,500 feet from the nearest public right of way. The company also constructed a wall made of shipping containers and planted native trees in a 5- acre buffer zone to obscure the site from view and to provide additional sound dampening.
Though the facility is not subject to stormwater pollution prevention requirements because stormwater will be discharged to the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (MWRD) of Greater Chicago wastewater treatment systems, the company added a stormwater system from Watertectonics, Everette, Washington.
Kallas says, “Installation of the wastewater treatment system was a decision made by the owners of RMG to go above and beyond the requirements of the Illinois EPA and the MWRD and a way to ensure that the standards for discharge to the MWRD system won’t be a concern.”
Southside’s water treatment system will capture process water and stormwater runoff and is similar to what General Iron had installed on the north side, he says. It features two detention ponds that cover more than 2.5 acres and can hold almost 4 million gallons of water and a clarifier that employs sand filtration. The system removes sediment and particulate, pretreating the water before it goes to the city’s water treatment system.
To control fugitive dust, the site uses water trucks, street sweepers and large misting cannons at strategic locations.
Per the LRF, Southside also must monitor the air for particulate matter (PM). The larger RMG site, not just the Southside parcel, has downwind and upwind monitors that continuously record PM 10 levels, which refers to particles with a diameter of 10 microns. “If there is what they call a ‘reportable action level (RAL),’ which is the difference between the downwind monitor and the upwind monitor of more than 150 micrograms per cubic meter, basically we are not in violation, but we are required to notify the city that there was that RAL,” Kallas says.
He adds that this is intended to alert Southside to issues that could lead to potential violations in the future if not addressed.
According to Southside Recycling, though, the claims of environmental racism have already been adjudicated. In October 2020, three southeast side residents brought a federal lawsuit against the city of Chicago, alleging that the city’s actions in signing the agreement with RMG and General Iron and issuing the first of several needed permits to Southside Recycling were discriminatory in nature. Judge Mary Rowland of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled in April 2021 that the residents had failed to prove that the city’s actions were motivated by a discriminatory purpose based on the racial makeup of the southeast side.
Joseph adds that RMG “vehemently denies that the location of the new business has anything to do with the demographics of the surrounding neighborhood.”
He adds, “The site was chosen because we already owned the land. RMG has operated various recycling businesses on the same land for nearly 30 years without incident or complaint from neighbors. This site also has ideal infrastructure for a shredding operation—river access to load barges and ships, railroad service for ease of shipping, high voltage electrical lines—as well as significant buffering from the surrounding neighborhood.”
He adds that pressure from the city, which was seeking to clear the way for a $6 billion multiuse development called Lincoln Yards on the north side of Chicago, ultimately led to General Iron’s closure. The company did not want to close that location, which Joseph says was both profitable and properly permitted, but its hand was forced in the situation.
In addition to EJ activists, the U.S. EPA issued a press release May 27 discussing the need to advance EJ in Chicago and expressing concerns that Southside Recycling could adversely affect an area of Chicago that is “historically overburdened with pollution.”
Joseph agrees that EJ is an important issue and that the southeast side has historically been home to many polluting industries. “I don’t disagree with any of that,” he says. “But the fact that we have to defend recycling to them is insane to me. You’re environmentalists—look what we’re doing. You all drive a car, use a washing machine, have a refrigerator, drive on roads that have rebar in them. These metal products are out there, we’re all using them every day. What do you want to do with it when it’s done? I get that you don’t want it done here, but what is your alternate solution? How about a consideration of the economics and the carbon footprint of where you’re going to take it to recycle it? I get nobody wants to see it in their front yard or backyard, sure, but our shredder is significantly removed and extremely well buffered [from the public right of way] …The distance from the shredder infeed to the nearest house is half a mile.”
He says the company’s shredder also is more than 10 times farther from public roadways and nearby residences than other shredders in Chicago, including General Iron’s shuttered Lincoln Park operation.
RMG has tried to reach out to EJ activists concerned about the site and has encouraged them to tour the facility to see the efforts the company has taken to address pollution concern, but Joseph says that they have not engaged directly with the company since SETF attorney Keith Harley’s email following the 2018 community meeting that RMG and General Iron officials held.
Joseph adds that the company has been working to get as many stakeholders as possible to visit the facility and see what Southside Recycling has constructed. “We’ve had multiple different efforts that have been going on the past year and a half trying to get as many people as we can onto the site to show them,” he says. “Every person who has actually toured the facility has been clearly impressed with what we’ve built.”
He notes that RMG polled community members in May on their opinions about the facility after a request from the city. Based on that data, he says the majority of community members around the facility were unaware of the project, but expressed positive views when informed of the importance of metals recycling and the new jobs the business would create.
“A lot of people didn’t know anything about it,” he says. “We believe, and believe the data shows, that [the opposition] is a relatively small group.”
Joseph continues, “There is a reason that we have operated multiple businesses on this same property for over two decades, and it’s only now that these environmental groups are learning our name. While there have certainly been other companies that have caused harm to this community, we have proven that we are an environmentally responsible actor and a good neighbor. The way we have designed and built Southside Recycling and the way we will operate it will only serve as further evidence of that commitment.”
First but not the last
It’s been nearly a year since Southside Recycling applied for its final LRF permit needed to begin operations, and, with no details on the U.S. EPA’s requested analysis and the ongoing litigation, it is unclear when the situation will be resolved.
In the meantime, the facility is ready to go and employees are in place for startup once that day comes. Joseph says the company is keeping all of the shredding facility’s employees on payroll. A few employees have retired or left to pursue other opportunities, but Joseph says that Southside Recycling’s team is prepared to begin operations as soon as their permit is issued.
“We have kept all of our admin staff and everybody else who has been willing to stay. We’ve relocated some to work in other [RMG] operations and some are working in the retail yard, but we still have about 80 people [on the Southside Recycling payroll],” he says. “In this labor market, first and foremost, we don’t want to lose the crew because they are so good and were a big factor in us buying this business rather than just starting from scratch. The institutional knowledge possessed by that group of people that General Iron had is invaluable when trying to run a successful shredding operation. We don’t want to lose them, especially given the current labor market, and we’re doing whatever we can to keep everybody.”
Joseph says he doesn’t think Southside Recycling will be the last scrap yard to face battles over air emissions and EJ.
In July, the EPA issued an “Enforcement Alert,” targeting auto shredder operator facilities for air quality concerns. The EPA says it had “identified Clean Air Act violations at metal recycling facilities that operate auto and metal shredders, causing excess emissions of air pollution.” The Enforcement Alert outlines best practices for mitigation of environmental concerns at shredding operations. According to RMG, the suggestions in the enforcement align with how Southside Recycling was designed and constructed.
During the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries (ISRI) online convention and exposition April 20-22 and April 27-29, EPA Office of Environmental Justice Director Matthew Tejada said EJ is going to become increasingly important for scrap yard operators in the coming years. He noted that President Joe Biden released two executive orders in January alone related to EJ, adding that these orders coming from states and local governments will require scrap recyclers to consider things such as where to locate and whether to expand a business so that it does not adversely affect disadvantaged communities.
Addressing emissions and considering EJ are two things that could become the “new normal” for auto shredding operations. In Chicago, any automobile shredder operators will need to comply with the city’s LRF permit just as Southside Recycling does.
Joseph concludes, “There are multiple requests for information that are out to lots and lots of shredders in terms of VOC emissions. So, the world is changing, and it’s changing rapidly. Based on the knowledge that we have gained regarding shredder emissions, I believe that most high volume shredders will need to begin capturing and destroying emissions—as we will do at Southside Recycling—in the very near future.”
The MRF Operations Forum and Paper & Plastics Recycling Conference will transition to virtual formats.
The Recycling Today Media Group, the publisher of Recycling Today, has notified attendees, exhibitors, sponsors and speakers that it has decided to cancel the 2021 MRF Operations Forum and Paper & Plastics Recycling Conference, which were scheduled for Oct. 19 and Oct. 20-21, respectively, in Chicago at the Marriott Marquis. We will instead transition to online events, with additional details to be forthcoming.
The Recycling Today Media Group has been committed to delivering the industry’s leading conferences and events for more than 20 years. We take pride in the quality education and networking we’ve been able to deliver to our industries.
Therefore, with the integrity of our events and the well-being of our attendees, speakers, exhibitors, sponsors and staff in mind, we have made the decision to cancel our in-person MRF Operations Forum and Paper & Plastics Recycling Conference this year.
Regretfully, the imposition of corporate travel restrictions since Labor Day and increased concern about the spread of the COVID delta variant creates a situation where we know attendance will be significantly affected. While that has not happened to date, we know it’s coming and that it will significantly decrease the event’s value. We respect that, and our customers, so we’ve had to make this very hard decision.
While we are eager to connect with our industry once again, and we know many of you are as well, we are looking forward to doing so when we can safely deliver the same standard of events and networking opportunities you’ve grown accustomed to.
Individuals who already registered for one or both of these events have two options regarding their current registration(s):
Additionally, plans are underway to share the insights of our expert speakers and to explore the session topics we had planned to address in person. We will announce those full details soon.
Canadian beverage maker says the straws are recyclable.
Sun-Rype Products, a division of Canada-based A. Lassonde Inc., has announced it has replaced plastic straws with paper straws in all SunRype 200 milliliter (ml) single-serve beverage boxes in Canada. The beverage producer calls the straws recyclable and bendable.
“We are on track to meet our sustainable development objectives by 2025,” says Claire Bara, president of A. Lassonde. “We plan on incorporating recyclable packaging for all of our products, and the launch of paper straws on our single-serve juice products is another step in the right direction. We know that our customers place a lot of importance on finding products that meet today’s environmental challenges, and these SunRype juice containers with new bendable paper straws are now available at Canadian grocery retailers - just in time for back-to-school lunch boxes.”
SunRype says with the new straws its Tetra Pak product containers are fully recyclable. “We are pleased to provide our customers with this environmentally responsible paper straw on all 200 ml beverage containers of our iconic brand, SunRype,” states Bara.
The launch of the paper straw follows Lassonde’s recent launch of new bottles containing 25 percent post-consumer recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) for all its juice brands available in 300 ml (roughly 10 ounce) packages in Canada.
By 2023, British Columbia-based SunRype has as its goals: using 25 percent post-consumer recycled content in its PET bottles; using 100 percent recyclable packaging for all its products; and working with governments, industry and associations to promote the collection of recyclable materials.